How Slack Grew to 10M Users Without Ads [2025 Blueprint]

Author
Recent Posts

With over 10 years of growth marketing expertise, he specializes in data-driven frameworks like Product-Led Growth (PLG) and Community-Led Growth (CLG) with SEO. His mission is helping startups achieve sustainable growth through proven methodologies rather than random tactics.

Slack: Fastest Growing B2B App in History

Most SaaS companies burn millions on ads to grow. Slack did the opposite.

In August 2013, Slack launched their preview release. Within 24 hours, they had 8,000 users. No paid ads. No sales team. Just a preview shared with friends.

By 2023, they had:

10 million daily active users
$1.7 billion in annual revenue
70% of Fortune 100 companies using their platform
156,000 paying organizations

The shocking part? They didn’t hire salespeople until 2016. They didn’t hire a CMO until 2017. They reached a $1.1 billion valuation before doing either.

In this guide, you’ll discover:

The 3-stage framework Slack used (copy this for your startup)
Why their freemium model converted at 26% (vs 1-5% industry average)
How Twitter amplified word-of-mouth at scale
5 specific tactics you can steal today
What Slack got wrong (and what they’d change)

Let’s start with the unexpected beginning.

How Slack Grew to 10M Users Without Ads: Complete Growth Blueprint

Slack Origin: From Failed Game to Billion-Dollar Platform

From Glitch to Slack: A $17.5M Gaming Failure Becomes a Communication Giant

Stewart Butterfield didn’t set out to build Slack. He was building a game.

In 2009, Butterfield’s company Tiny Speck raised $17.5 million to build Glitch. It was an online multiplayer game with collaborative crafting and gathering. The game flopped. Not enough players. Not enough engagement.

But while building Glitch, the team created something else. An internal communication tool. They needed it because their team was scattered across locations, traditional IRC (Internet Relay Chat) was clunky, email threads became impossible to track, and they needed to share updates and files quickly.

After shutting down Glitch in 2012, Butterfield looked at their internal chat tool. The realization: “We have something more valuable than the game itself.”

What Made It Different

Searchable history: Find any conversation instantly (like Google for your team chat)

File sharing: Drag and drop anything, centralized storage

Synchronization: Start on desktop, continue on mobile without losing context

Integrations: Connect other tools teams already used

These features seem obvious now. In 2012, they were revolutionary.

The Pivot Decision

Butterfield convinced his 8-person team to pivot. They reached out to four companies to try their tool for free. Those first users stuck with it.

The validation: Within two weeks of their preview release, Slack hit $1 million in revenue. Six months later, they secured $120 million in venture capital.

Key Lesson for Founders

Sometimes your side project is more valuable than your main project. If your team built something to solve your own problem, other teams probably have that same problem.

Questions to ask:

What tools did we build for ourselves?
What problems do we complain about daily?
What would we pay for if someone else built it?

Butterfield had credibility from founding Flickr. But he still had to prove the concept with real users before anyone would invest.

Learn more about customer acquisition strategies that help validate product-market fit.

Stage 1: Foundation (0 to 15,000 Users in 2 Weeks)

The “Preview Release” Strategy That Got 8,000 Users in 24 Hours

Most startups launch with a beta test. Slack did something smarter.

Stewart Butterfield personally reached out to friends at other companies: Rdio (music streaming), Medium (publishing platform), TGC (gaming company), and Cozy (real estate). He asked them to try the product and give feedback.

Why This Worked

Butterfield’s reputation: Co-founded Flickr (sold to Yahoo for millions), respected in Silicon Valley. When he says “try this,” people listen.

Personal relationships: Not cold emails to strangers. Friends who trusted his judgment. People willing to give honest feedback.

Real usage, not just testing: Companies used it for actual work. Genuine feedback on real problems. Natural word-of-mouth if it worked.

The results:

August 13, 2013: Preview release launches
24 hours later: 8,000 sign-ups
Two weeks later: 15,000 users
February 2014 (public launch): 285,000 daily active users

Why They Called it “Preview” Not “Beta”

This decision mattered more than you’d think.

When users see “beta,” they think: buggy and unreliable, incomplete features, things will change drastically, not ready for serious work.

When users see “preview,” they think: polished product, nearly complete, exclusive early access, special opportunity.

Stewart Butterfield explained: “Calling it ‘beta’ gives teams an excuse to not take it seriously. We needed teams to use Slack for real work, not just test it.”

The Psychology

Beta equals permission to be mediocre. Preview equals expectation of excellence.

This forced Slack’s team to launch with a polished product, fix issues immediately, meet high quality standards, and build trust from day one.

Those 8,000 first-day users didn’t just sign up. They stayed. They invited teammates. They became champions. By launch day in February 2014, Slack had 285,000 daily active users.

The “Friends First” Distribution Strategy

Slack didn’t buy ads or send cold emails. They started with relationships.

Months before launch, Butterfield personally demo’d the product to friends, asked for feedback (not just sign-ups), refined based on what early users said, and built relationships before asking for anything.

At launch, friends became evangelists, word-of-mouth spread through networks, each happy user brought their team, and organic growth accelerated.

Why This Works Better Than Ads

Traditional launches spend $50K+ on ads to reach strangers with 1-2% conversion, while users remain skeptical. Slack’s launch cost $0 on ads, reached trusted networks with 30%+ conversion, and users were pre-sold.

The key insight: 92% of people trust recommendations from friends more than advertising.

Butterfield used this. Each friend who tried Slack told 5-10 other people. Those people told others. The network effect began.

Action Items for Founders

Build your friend network before launch: List 20 people who trust your judgment, demo the product personally, ask for detailed feedback, and make them feel like co-creators.

Choose your language carefully: Use “Preview” over “Beta,” “Early access” over “Testing phase,” and “Founding member” over “Test user.”

Start with people who have distribution: Other founders with audiences, people active on social media, industry influencers you know personally, and anyone with a team to bring.

Launch when ready, not perfect: Slack spent months on polish but launched before adding everything. They fixed issues based on real feedback and iterated constantly.

Understanding customer acquisition costs helps you evaluate whether organic strategies like Slack’s are working for your startup.

Stage 2: Viral Acceleration (15K to 500K Users in 8 Months)

How Slack Scaled Word-of-Mouth Through Twitter

After the preview release, Slack faced a problem. Personal word-of-mouth worked great. But it doesn’t scale.

Think about it: You tell 5 friends about a product. That’s your limit. Maybe they tell 5 more. Growth is slow.

Slack’s solution: The Twitter Wall of Love.

The Twitter Wall of Love Strategy

Slack created a dedicated page showcasing real user tweets.

Examples of what appeared:

“HELL YEAH WE’RE USING @SlackHQ AT WORK I. LOVE. SLACK.”
“Slack has changed how our team works. No more email chaos.”
“Can’t believe I used email for team communication before this.”

The numbers: 10,000 tweets per month in early days, 6 team members monitoring Twitter 24/7, every single mention got a response, and the wall updated constantly with new testimonials.

Why This Worked

Amplified word-of-mouth at scale

Traditional word-of-mouth: 1 person tells 5 friends, maybe reaches 25 people total, takes weeks to spread.

Twitter word-of-mouth: 1 tweet reaches hundreds, retweets reach thousands, happens in minutes.

Social proof that compounds

When you see one person excited about Slack, you’re curious. When you see hundreds of people excited, you have FOMO (fear of missing out).

Created a community feeling

Users who tweeted got responses from Slack’s team. They felt heard and valued, part of something special, and motivated to tweet more.

Free PR and credibility

Media outlets noticed the phenomenon. Articles got written about why everyone’s talking about Slack on Twitter, the fastest growing B2B app in history, and how Slack won Silicon Valley. Each article brought more users. More users brought more tweets. More tweets brought more articles.

The viral loop was complete.

Stewart Butterfield on Twitter Strategy

“We bet heavily on Twitter. Even if someone is incredibly enthusiastic about a product, literal word of mouth will only get to a handful of people — but if someone tweets about us, it can be seen by hundreds, even thousands.”

The breakthrough moment: In August 2014, Marc Andreessen (Slack investor) tweeted their growth chart. The tweet went viral. 100,000+ views. Massive credibility boost.

When a legendary investor shares your growth publicly, it validates everything. VCs started calling. Press started writing. Users started signing up faster.

The “Email Killer” Positioning

Slack needed a hook. Something memorable. Their PR agency suggested “Be Less Busy.” Butterfield rejected it. Too vague.

Then someone suggested: “The Email Killer.” Perfect.

Why This Positioning Worked

Clear enemy: Everyone hates email overload

Bold claim: Gets attention and debate

Simple to explain: “It’s the email killer for teams”

Creates conversation: People argued about whether it actually killed email

The truth? Slack never intended to replace email entirely.

Butterfield clarified: “Email has many benefits — it’s the lowest common denominator for official communications. But it’s a terrible way to manage internal communications.”

The Strategy

Position against email for internal communication only. Not all communication. This let teams adopt Slack without feeling like they had to abandon email completely.

The results: Featured in Time Magazine as “Email Killer,” hundreds of blog articles discussing it, clear positioning in market, and easy for users to explain to others.

The lesson: Your positioning doesn’t have to be literally true. It has to be memorable, debatable, easy to explain, and emotionally resonant.

The Freemium Model That Converted at 26%

While Twitter created awareness, Slack’s freemium model converted users into customers.

The industry reality: Typical freemium conversion is 1-5%, good freemium products achieve 5-10%, excellent freemium products reach 10-15%, and Slack achieved 26%. That’s 5-10x better than average.

What’s Included in Slack’s Free Tier

Slack took a different approach to free plans.

Most SaaS free plans have limited time (14-30 days), require credit card upfront, restrict key features, and pressure users to upgrade.

Slack’s free plan offers unlimited time, no credit card required, all core features included, and lets you use it until you need more.

What Free Users Get

90 days of searchable message history: See conversations from last 3 months, search through everything, and export if needed.

Unlimited public and private channels: Organize by project, team, topic, create as many as you need, with no artificial limits.

10 app integrations: Connect Google Drive, Trello, GitHub, etc. Enough for most small teams. Shows the power of integrations.

1-on-1 voice and video calls: Quick huddles with teammates, screen sharing included, no time limits.

File sharing and storage: Drag and drop files, centralized in conversations, easy to find later.

Two-factor authentication: Security from day one, no compromise on safety, enterprise-ready basics.

What’s Limited

Message history beyond 90 days, more than 10 integrations, group video calls, advanced admin features, and priority support.

The Psychology Behind 26% Conversion

Slack’s conversion rate isn’t accidental. It’s designed.

The key insight: Don’t gate features that create value. Gate features that unlock more value after you’re already hooked.

How It Works

Month 1: Team starts using free plan. All core features work perfectly. Team builds communication habits. Slack becomes daily routine. No pressure to upgrade.

Month 2: Usage increases. More channels created. More files shared. More integrations added. Still no pressure.

Month 3: First friction point. Message history starts rolling off (90-day limit). Team realizes they need old conversations. But they’re already dependent on Slack. Upgrading feels natural, not forced.

The magic: By the time you hit limits, you can’t imagine working without Slack.

Other Triggers That Drive Upgrades

Integration limits: Free tier includes 10 integrations. Team using all 10. Wants to add 11th. Needs paid plan.

Team size growth: Starts with 5 people. Grows to 20. More users equal more value. Upgrade feels worth it.

Video call needs: 1-on-1 calls work great on free. Team wants group video. Upgrade unlocks this.

Compliance requirements: Growing company needs audit logs. Security becomes important. Enterprise features required.

The Fair Billing Policy

Slack added one policy that changed everything. If a user is inactive for 14+ days, you automatically get a refund.

Why This Matters

Traditional SaaS charges for every seat, even if people don’t use it, hopes customers don’t notice, and feels like they’re trying to squeeze you.

Slack’s approach: Only charge for active users, automatic refunds, no tricks or hidden fees, and feels fair and trustworthy.

The Psychology

This policy does three things:

Removes fear: “What if we add users and they don’t use it?” “Slack will refund us. No risk.”

Encourages adding more users: Teams add people freely, knowing inactive users don’t cost anything.

Creates word-of-mouth: “Can you believe Slack refunds unused seats? That’s amazing!”

The Business Case

You’d think this would hurt revenue. It didn’t.

Why it worked: More teams willing to add users, faster company-wide adoption, higher overall usage, more word-of-mouth, and stronger retention.

The result: 156,000 paying organizations by 2023. Average 17 users per organization. 143% net dollar retention (customers spend 43% more each year).

Action Items for Founders

Design your free tier strategically

Questions to ask: What creates initial value? (Include in free). What creates sustained value? (Gate for paid). Where do users get hooked? (Make sure free tier gets them there). What’s the natural upgrade trigger?

Remove friction from sign-up: No credit card required, easy onboarding, instant value, clear path to paid when needed.

Make billing fair and transparent: Refund unused seats, prorate everything, no surprise charges, make customers feel good about paying.

Track your conversion rate: Measure free-to-paid monthly, identify where users upgrade, optimize those trigger points, and test different limits.

Focus on usage, not just sign-ups: 1,000 active free users beats 10,000 inactive. Usage predicts conversion. Engagement drives retention.

Learn more about optimizing your customer acquisition vs retention costs to maximize growth efficiency.

Stage 3: Enterprise Scale (500K to 10M Users)

How Slack Reached Enterprises Without Hiring Salespeople

Most B2B companies hire sales teams to sell to enterprises. Slack took a different path.

The traditional enterprise sales model: Hire expensive salespeople, cold call executives, long sales cycles (6-18 months), negotiate custom contracts, and top-down adoption.

Slack’s model: No salespeople until 2016 (after $1B valuation), bottom-up adoption, short sales cycles (30-90 days), standard pricing, and product sells itself.

Bottom-Up Enterprise Adoption

Slack entered enterprises through the side door.

The Process

Step 1: Individual team adopts

Marketing team frustrated with email. Someone tries Slack’s free plan. Team loves it, spreads word. No IT approval needed (it’s free).

Step 2: Other teams see it working

Engineering team notices Marketing using Slack. They try it too. Sales team joins. Product team starts using it.

Step 3: Company-wide momentum

50+ employees using Slack. Multiple departments dependent. IT department finally notices. Instead of blocking it, they ask how to make it official.

Step 4: Enterprise deal closes

Slack’s account manager (not salesperson) reaches out. Company already using it extensively. Just need to formalize and secure it. Upgrade to Enterprise Grid.

The genius: By the time IT gets involved, Slack is already essential. They can’t ban it without major disruption.

Real example: Adobe had 60+ teams running their own Slack instances before IT made it official company-wide.

The Integration Ecosystem Strategy

Slack didn’t try to replace every tool. They connected to every tool.

The positioning: “Slack is the connective tissue of the modern workplace.”

Not: “Replace your CRM,” “We do everything,” or “Stop using other tools.”

But: “Connect your CRM to Slack,” “We work with everything,” and “Keep using tools you love.”

The Strategy

Build robust API: Easy for developers to integrate, well-documented, free for partners.

Create App Directory: Showcase all integrations, make discovery easy, drive partner adoption.

Co-market with partners: Zapier + Slack, Google Drive + Slack, Salesforce + Slack, Asana + Slack.

The numbers: 2014 had 100 integrations, 2017 had 1,000+ integrations, and 2023 has 2,600+ integrations.

Why This Worked

For users: Slack becomes central hub, don’t have to switch tools, everything in one place, workflows get easier.

For Slack: Each integration adds value, creates stickiness, makes switching painful, expands use cases.

For partners: Access to Slack’s user base, integration drives adoption, both products benefit.

The partnership with Salesforce: Initially competitors (Salesforce had Chatter). Then partners (integrated Salesforce into Slack). Finally acquisition (Salesforce bought Slack for $27.7B in 2021).

Network Effects at Scale

The more people used Slack, the more valuable it became.

Types of Network Effects Slack Built

Within-team effects: 1 person on Slack can’t communicate. Whole team on Slack makes it essential. Result: Single user brings entire team.

Cross-team effects: Marketing using Slack successfully. Engineering wants it too. Sales team adopts next. Result: Spreads throughout company.

Cross-company effects (Slack Connect): Agency + Client both need Slack. Vendor + Customer both need Slack. Partners all need Slack. Result: Ecosystem lock-in.

The Data

Users connected to Slack 9+ hours per workday. Active usage: 90 minutes per day. 50% of paid customers used Slack Connect. 1.5 billion messages sent weekly.

Why Network Effects Matter

Once your team, company, and partners are on Slack: switching is extremely painful, would have to convince everyone to move, risk of losing communication history, and not worth the disruption.

This is Slack’s moat.

Action Items for Founders

Design for bottom-up adoption: Make it easy for individuals to try, no approval needed for free tier, show value immediately, let success spread organically.

Build integration, not isolation: Connect to tools users already love, don’t try to replace everything, make your product the hub, partner with complementary tools.

Leverage network effects: Make product more valuable with more users, build features that require teams, create incentives to invite others, make switching painful (in a good way).

Create champions within companies: Give power users special treatment, provide resources to evangelize, make them look good to their bosses, turn them into internal salespeople.

For more insights on scaling your startup, check out these data-driven growth strategies.

The Numbers: What This Strategy Achieved

Slack’s Growth Metrics (2013-2023)

Let’s look at the actual numbers.

User Growth

August 2013: 8,000 daily active users (Preview release, 24 hours)
August 2013: 15,000 daily active users (Two weeks later)
February 2014: 285,000 daily active users (Public launch)
August 2014: 500,000 daily active users (Series C funding)
February 2015: 1,100,000 daily active users (4x growth in 6 months)
2016: 4,000,000 daily active users (First salespeople hired)
2019: 10,000,000 daily active users (IPO year)
2023: 10,000,000+ daily active users (Current, post-Salesforce acquisition)

Revenue Growth

2017: $105 million annual revenue
2018: $221 million annual revenue (110% YoY growth)
2019: $401 million annual revenue (81% YoY growth)
2020: $630 million annual revenue (57% YoY growth)
2021: $902 million annual revenue (43% YoY growth)
2023: $1.7 billion annual revenue
2025: $4.22 billion projected annual revenue

Valuation Milestones

October 2014: $1.1 billion (8 months after launch)
April 2015: $2.8 billion
April 2016: $3.8 billion August 2018: $7.1 billion
June 2019: $19.5 billion (IPO)
December 2020: $27.7 billion (Salesforce acquisition)

Enterprise Adoption

70% of Fortune 100 companies use Slack 156,000 paying organizations 575+ companies paying $100K+ annually Average 17 users per organization

Engagement Metrics

90 minutes active usage per day 9+ hours connected per workday 1.5 billion messages sent weekly Over 200 messages per user per day

Conversion and Retention

26% conversion rate (free to paid) 143% net dollar retention 30,000 active teams (of 220,000 created) Average 8-9 members per active team

Comparison with Competitors

Slack launched in 2013 with product-led growth strategy. First 24 hours brought 8,000 users. Current DAU is 10M+. Revenue in 2023 was $1.7B. Conversion rate is 26%. 70% of Fortune 100 companies use it.

Microsoft Teams launched in 2017 with sales-led growth strategy. First 24 hours brought 329,000 users. Current MAU is 320M+. Revenue is part of M365 bundle. Conversion rate is N/A (bundled). 85%+ of Fortune 100 companies use it.

HipChat launched in 2010 with traditional B2B strategy. First 24 hours numbers unknown. It was shut down in 2018. Acquired by Atlassian. Conversion rate was approximately 5%. Less than 5% of Fortune 100 companies used it before shutdown.

Key Insights

Microsoft Teams has more users but is bundled with Office 365 (not a fair comparison). Many “users” barely use it. Slack users are more engaged.

Slack converted better with higher conversion rate, better retention, and more daily engagement.

Both beat traditional competitors: HipChat used old B2B model, required salespeople from start, and couldn’t compete with product-led growth.

ROI for Companies Using Slack

Companies see measurable returns from using Slack.

Productivity Improvements

32% fewer emails sent internally 27% fewer meetings held 48% faster project completion 25% faster decision-making

Financial Returns

338% average ROI over 3 years $7.50 returned for every $1 spent Average $1.8M saved per 500 employees Payback period: 8-12 months

Employee Satisfaction

86% improved collaboration 82% better transparency 73% faster onboarding 69% better work-life balance

These numbers explain why 70% of Fortune 100 adopted it, 143% net dollar retention exists, and strong word-of-mouth continues.

5 Growth Tactics You Can Steal From Slack Today

Actionable Strategies for Your Startup

Here’s what you can implement right now.

Tactic 1: Launch with “Preview” Not “Beta”

What Slack Did

Called early release a “preview,” set higher quality expectations, and created exclusivity and FOMO.

Why It Worked

Beta signals buggy and unreliable. Preview signals polished and exclusive. Psychology matters.

How to Implement

Step 1: Polish your product before launch

Fix critical bugs, test with small group, and make it actually work well.

Step 2: Choose language carefully

Use “Preview release,” “Founding member access,” or “Early access program.” Avoid “Beta test.”

Step 3: Set expectations

Communicate: “This is nearly complete.” Ask for feedback: “Help us make it perfect.” Create urgency: “Limited preview spots.”

Expected Results

Higher quality standards from yourself, more serious early users, better word-of-mouth, and stronger launch momentum.

Tactic 2: Build Your Twitter Wall of Love

What Slack Did

Created dedicated testimonial page, showcased real user tweets, responded to every mention, and had 6 team members on Twitter 24/7.

Why It Worked

Social proof at scale, amplified word-of-mouth, built community, and generated PR.

How to Implement

Week 1: Set up monitoring

Create Twitter lists for your brand mentions, set up Google Alerts, use tools like Mention or Brand24, and assign team members to monitor.

Week 2: Start engaging

Respond to every mention (positive and negative), thank users for feedback, help solve problems publicly, and retweet the best testimonials.

Week 3: Create the wall

Build a dedicated page on your site, embed your best tweets, update it weekly, and share the link in sales conversations.

Week 4: Scale the strategy

Make sharing easy (add share buttons), create pre-written tweets users can customize, feature “user of the week,” and turn champions into evangelists.

Expected Results

10-20x reach vs traditional WOM, stronger social proof, more organic mentions, and better conversion rates.

Tactic 3: Design Strategic Freemium Limits

What Slack Did

Generous free tier (90 days messages, core features), limits that trigger when users are hooked, and fair billing with automatic refunds.

Why It Worked

Removed friction from trying, let teams get dependent, and created natural upgrade path.

How to Implement

Step 1: Map your value creation

What creates initial value? (Make this free). What creates sustained value? (This can be paid). When do users get hooked? (Free tier must reach this point).

Step 2: Choose limits wisely

Bad limits (don’t do this): Core features (kills adoption), time-based (14-day trials create pressure), user counts (stops team adoption).

Good limits (do this): Historical data (90-day message history), volume limits (10 integrations), advanced features (group video calls), compliance features (audit logs, SSO).

Step 3: Make upgrading feel natural

Show value before asking for payment, make limits visible but not annoying, celebrate when teams hit milestones, and offer prorated refunds for inactive users.

Expected Results

Higher conversion rate (aim for 10%+), longer time on free tier (good thing), stronger product-market fit validation, and better retention post-conversion.

Tactic 4: Enable Bottom-Up Enterprise Adoption

What Slack Did

Made free tier available without IT approval, let individual teams adopt, waited for organic spread, and then approached IT to formalize.

Why It Worked

Avoided long enterprise sales cycles, proved value before asking for budget, created internal champions, and made adoption inevitable.

How to Implement

Step 1: Remove barriers to individual adoption

No credit card for free tier, no approval needed, instant setup, and self-service onboarding.

Step 2: Design for team value

Features that require collaboration, make it better when more teammates join, easy to invite others, and visible to other teams in company.

Step 3: Create enterprise-ready features

Security and compliance from day one, admin controls for when IT comes calling, usage analytics to show value, and clear enterprise upgrade path.

Step 4: Identify and nurture champions

Track power users in large companies, provide them with resources, make them look good internally, and eventually approach IT through them.

Expected Results

Faster sales cycles (30-90 days vs 6-18 months), higher win rates (already using it), lower customer acquisition costs, and stronger retention (organic adoption).

Tactic 5: Build Integration Ecosystem

What Slack Did

Positioned as hub (not replacement), built robust API, created app directory, and co-marketed with partners.

Why It Worked

Made product more valuable, created switching costs, expanded use cases, and generated partner marketing.

How to Implement

Step 1: Build your API first

Well-documented, easy to use, generous rate limits, and free for partners.

Step 2: Identify integration priorities

What tools do your users already love? Where do they spend time? What workflows can you improve? Which partners have distribution?

Step 3: Create showcase page

Dedicated integrations directory, easy discovery and installation, user reviews and ratings, and featured partnerships.

Step 4: Co-market with partners

Joint case studies, webinars together, cross-promotion, and affiliate programs.

Expected Results

Higher engagement (more integrations used), better retention (harder to leave), expanded use cases, and partner-driven growth.

For more examples of successful growth strategies, explore how Canva achieved product-led growth.

Some potential customers chose simpler competitors. Required more sales support to explain tiers. Conversion rate could have been even higher.

The Lesson

Keep pricing simple as long as possible. Every tier you add creates confusion. Test pricing changes carefully.

Frequently Asked Questions About Slack’s Growth Strategy

How did Slack get its first 8,000 users in 24 hours?

Slack got 8,000 users in 24 hours through a strategic preview release in August 2013. Stewart Butterfield leveraged his network from founding Flickr, reaching out to friends at companies like Rdio, Medium, TGC, and Cozy.

They called it a “preview release” instead of “beta” to set higher quality expectations. This approach worked because Butterfield had credibility in Silicon Valley from his previous success with Flickr. When he personally asked friends to try the product, they trusted his judgment.

The preview release created exclusivity and FOMO (fear of missing out). Early users felt special getting access to something nearly complete rather than a buggy beta. They used Slack for real work, not just testing, which generated meaningful feedback and strong word-of-mouth.

What is Slack’s freemium conversion rate?

Slack achieves a 26% free-to-paid conversion rate. This is 5-10x higher than the typical freemium SaaS conversion rate of 1-5%.

This high conversion rate happens through several strategic design choices. Slack offers a generous free tier with 90 days of searchable messages, unlimited channels, 10 app integrations, and all core features. No credit card is required to start.

Slack also implemented a fair billing policy that automatically refunds inactive users after 14 days, which builds trust and encourages teams to add more members without fear of wasting money.

Out of 10 million daily active users, approximately 3 million pay for premium plans.

How much revenue does Slack generate?

Slack generated $1.7 billion in annual revenue in 2023, growing from just $105 million in 2017.
Revenue growth timeline:
2017: $105 million
2018: $221 million (110% year-over-year growth)
2019: $401 million (81% year-over-year growth)
2023: $1.7 billion
2025: $4.22 billion (projected)
Revenue comes from multiple sources. The Pro plan costs $2.67 per user per month (billed annually). The Business+ plan costs $5.00 per user per month (billed annually). Enterprise Grid uses custom pricing for large organizations.

Slack serves 156,000+ paying organizations. Over 575 organizations pay $100,000+ annually. The company maintains a 143% net dollar retention rate, meaning existing customers spend 43% more each year through adding users, upgrading tiers, or expanding to more teams.

Slack reached $1 million in revenue in their first two weeks of 2014.

Did Slack use paid advertising to grow?

No. Slack achieved a $1.1 billion valuation without paid advertising, a CMO, or a sales team.
Instead of traditional marketing, Slack used word-of-mouth marketing where early users became brand champions. The Twitter Wall of Love amplified testimonials, receiving 10,000 tweets monthly. Natural spread within companies created organic growth.

They employed product-led growth with a generous free tier that drove adoption. The product quality created referrals without needing marketing spend. Network effects made the platform essential once teams adopted it.

Strategic PR and positioning as the “Email Killer” generated press coverage. Butterfield’s reputation from founding Flickr helped get initial attention.

Timeline: From 2013-2016, Slack had zero paid ads, no CMO, and no sales team. In 2016, they hired their first salespeople (after reaching $1.1B valuation). In 2017, they hired their first CMO, Bill Macaitis from Zendesk.

This proves you can build a billion-dollar company through product excellence and word-of-mouth alone.

Learn more about building viral growth strategies for your startup.

What was Slack’s Twitter Wall of Love strategy?

The Twitter Wall of Love was Slack’s viral growth engine on social media. It was a dedicated page showcasing real user testimonials from Twitter.

The wall featured authentic tweets like “HELL YEAH WE’RE USING @SlackHQ AT WORK I. LOVE. SLACK” and hundreds of similar enthusiastic testimonials. It received up to 10,000 tweets per month during the first six months.

Slack had 6 team members monitoring Twitter 24/7. They responded to every mention within minutes, whether positive or negative. This made users feel heard and valued, encouraging more people to tweet about their experiences.

Why this worked: Traditional word-of-mouth reaches 5 people. A tweet reaches hundreds or thousands. This amplified word-of-mouth at scale.

The social proof created FOMO. When prospects saw hundreds of people excited about Slack, they wanted to try it too. Media outlets noticed the phenomenon and wrote articles, creating even more buzz.

Stewart Butterfield explained: “We bet heavily on Twitter. Even if someone is incredibly enthusiastic about a product, literal word of mouth will only get to a handful of people — but if someone tweets about us, it can be seen by hundreds, even thousands.”

The breakthrough moment came when Marc Andreessen (Slack investor) tweeted their growth chart in August 2014. The tweet went viral with 100,000+ views, providing massive credibility.

What percentage of Fortune 100 companies use Slack?

70% of Fortune 100 companies use Slack as of 2023. That’s 70 out of the 100 largest US companies.

Notable users include IBM, Oracle, Target, Intuit, T-Mobile, and many other major enterprises.
This enterprise adoption happened organically through bottom-up adoption rather than traditional enterprise sales. Individual teams started using the free plan, proved value within their departments, spread to other teams, and eventually became company-wide tools.

By the time IT departments got involved, Slack was already essential to operations. Instead of blocking it, IT departments formalized and secured the deployment.

Additional enterprise statistics:
575+ organizations paying $100,000+ annually
Average 17 users per organization
Growing enterprise segment year over year

Companies chose Slack because it was already in use by teams (organic adoption), showed proven ROI (32% fewer emails, 27% fewer meetings), performed better than competitors (vs HipChat, Microsoft Teams initially), and offered a robust integration ecosystem.

Enterprise ROI: Companies using Slack see 338% return on investment over 3 years, 32% reduction in emails, 27% fewer meetings, and faster decision-making.

How did Slack compete with Microsoft Teams?

Slack had a 4-year head start (launched 2013 vs Teams in 2017) but Microsoft caught up through different strategies.

Slack’s advantages: First-mover with 4-year head start, established brand and loyal user base, best-in-class product with better UX, more intuitive interface, faster performance, superior search functionality, and independent platform that works with any ecosystem without vendor lock-in.

Microsoft’s advantages: Bundled with Office 365 and included in existing subscriptions with no additional cost, easier enterprise procurement, deep Microsoft integration with Office apps, OneDrive, Outlook, and Azure, and existing Microsoft customer relationships with IT department buy-in and security compliance.

What happened: From 2017-2019, Teams grew fast via bundling. In 2020, COVID accelerated both platforms. In 2021, Teams surpassed Slack in user count. In December 2020, Salesforce acquired Slack for $27.7 billion.

Current state: Slack focuses on product excellence, best-of-breed integrations, and companies wanting platform independence. Teams dominates Microsoft-heavy enterprises, cost-conscious organizations, and Office 365 subscribers.

The comparison: Slack has 10M+ daily active users with $1.7B revenue in 2023 and 26% conversion rate. Microsoft Teams has 320M+ monthly active users (note the difference in metric), revenue bundled with M365, and N/A conversion rate.

Even with better product and head start, distribution matters. Microsoft’s existing customer base, bundling strategy, and enterprise relationships provided massive advantages. Slack’s response was doubling down on product quality and joining forces with Salesforce.

See how other companies achieved similar growth with product-led strategies like Figma.

Conclusion: The Slack Growth Blueprint You Can Copy

Key Takeaways for Founders

Slack’s journey from 8,000 users to 10 million daily active users without paid advertising proves that product-led growth works.

The three-stage framework:

Stage 1: Foundation (0-15K users) used preview release positioning, friend network activation, and personal outreach to trusted contacts.

Stage 2: Viral Acceleration (15K-500K users) employed Twitter Wall of Love for social proof, “Email Killer” positioning, generous freemium model with 26% conversion, and natural upgrade triggers.

Stage 3: Enterprise Scale (500K-10M users) achieved bottom-up enterprise adoption, integration ecosystem strategy, and network effects that created lock-in.

The Core Principles

Product excellence matters most. Slack spent months polishing before launch. The product had to be good enough that users wanted to tell others.

Remove friction everywhere. No credit card for free tier. Easy onboarding. Instant value. Fair billing with refunds.

Build network effects into product. Make it more valuable as more people join. Create features that require teams. Make switching painful.

Amplify word-of-mouth through social media. Traditional word-of-mouth doesn’t scale. Twitter gave Slack 10-20x reach.

Let product sell itself. Slack didn’t hire salespeople until after $1B valuation. Bottom-up adoption worked better than top-down sales.

What This Means for Your Startup

You don’t need millions in ad spend to grow. You need a product people love, a frictionless way to try it, network effects that create value, and systems to amplify word-of-mouth.

Start with your network. Get 10-20 trusted friends to try your product. Listen to their feedback. Polish relentlessly. Make it something they want to tell others about.

Design your freemium tier strategically. Include enough value that teams can work effectively. Add limits that only trigger when they’re already dependent. Make upgrading feel natural, not forced.

Build for bottom-up adoption if targeting enterprises. Let individuals and teams adopt without IT approval. Prove value organically. Approach IT only after you’re already essential.

Create integrations, not isolation. Connect to tools users already love. Position as the hub that makes everything work together. Don’t try to replace everything.

The Timeline You Can Expect

Months 1-3: Focus on product-market fit. Get first 100 users from your network. Achieve strong retention (40%+ daily active). Generate authentic word-of-mouth.

Months 4-6: Scale word-of-mouth through social media. Build your Twitter Wall of Love. Optimize freemium conversion. Add users through referrals, not ads.

Months 7-12: Achieve viral coefficient above 1.0. See bottom-up enterprise adoption begin. Build integration ecosystem. Reach first revenue milestones.

Year 2+: Scale enterprise adoption. Improve conversion rate continuously. Expand internationally. Consider raising capital if needed.

Start Today

Pick one tactic from this guide and implement it this week. Build your Twitter Wall of Love. Redesign your freemium limits. Change “beta” to “preview.” Reach out to 20 friends to try your product.

Slack proved that product-led growth works. You don’t need their advantages (Butterfield’s reputation, Silicon Valley connections, gaming company funding). You need their principles: product excellence, frictionless adoption, network effects, and word-of-mouth amplification.

The question isn’t whether product-led growth works. Slack proved it does. The question is whether you’ll implement it.

For more growth strategies from successful companies, explore:

Share this article if you found it helpful. Follow us for more in-depth case studies on how the fastest-growing companies achieved their success.

Want to learn more about growth strategies? Check out these related articles:

Growth Strategy Case Studies:

Customer Acquisition Resources:

Startup Growth Frameworks:

B2B Marketing Strategies:

Start implementing these strategies today and watch your startup grow.